BAD B.I.D.?
A Public Comment to the General Plan Advisory Committee By Judith Kaluzny
I ask that you remove the reference to a Business Improvement District from your draft of a general plan. I understand the mention is to “encourage” a business improvement district. A business improvement district is a tax on businesses, collected as a property tax by the county tax assessor, in a defined area. It can be based on property ownership–and the owners pass the costs along to their tenants; or on individual businesses in the district.
This is found in the codes of the State of California in the Streets and Highways code. Thing is, a city can assist a BID ONLY AFTER the business people on their own form a group, plan the boundaries, get a petition signed to ask for having a BID. A BID is NOT for paying for regular maintenance of an area, but for improvements. An executive director will be hired, and a board of directors elected–another level of government and taxation for your small downtown businesses in this case.
The redevelopment department, inappropriately, has already tried that for $3,000 paid to a consultant and a balance in the accounts for another $27,000 for that consultant. Four meetings were held; I attended all, as did Cameron Irons and Mr. Terranova. Only at the last meeting did about five other business owners attend. And I had handed out many fliers to alert downtown businesses.
A year or two before that, Cameron Irons sent out a survey to downtown property owners regarding a BID. He gave me copies of the 12 or 14 replies. All were against it, but two said, if you are going to have it, we will participate.
The Nicole Coats had a meeting or two to gin up support for a BID. The two people (me and Henry Jones) who indicated willingness to participate were not invited. Those meeting with Nicole Coats–Cameron Irons, Terranova, Theresa Harvey, and two or three more chose the consultant. Paul Dunlap said he was invited, but declined to participate.
The idea of a BID for downtown arose when Councilmember Quirk asked if there wasn’t some way to get money for paying for the costs of maintaining downtown. Redevelopment Director Zur Schmeide told her that a business improvement district might be a way.
When the consultant was hired, I talked to both the city manager and Councilmember Quirk. Mr Meyer said, “we have an eight block area that is costing us over million and a half dollars a year. We have to do something.” Councilmember Quirk also spoke of a BID paying for the excess costs of maintaining the restaurant overlay district.
This is not the appropriate use or purpose of a BID! And it is by law supposed to arise from the grass roots business people, not top down from the city to get tax money for maintenance.
What I see happening is that if a BID were established for downtown, the only people who would have time or interest to serve on the board of directors will be restaurant/bar owners. Then they will vote to spend the taxes raised for maintenance so the city will not be so burdened by the bar district. (Which burden the city council created by abolishing CUPs for restaurants downtown.)
The Downtown Fullerton Restaurant Association is a non profit listed as c/o Cameron Irons, 118 North State College Boulevard, same address as Vanguard Investment Properties.
A classic, Fullerton Redevelopment staff scam: create a problem, subsidize the problem, then, rather than fix the problem you made by at least enforcing the municipal code you change the code, subsidize some more, then ask EVERYBODY to pay for the deficit that YOU created!
So, a BID would tax non-bar businesses, like the author’s law office, to clean up after the mess and mayhem caused by out of control bar patrons who break the windows of furniture shops and real estate offices, and urinate in their doorways? Nice solution, city folks. Just another subsidy for the restaurants and bars.
In theory there should be a bunch of citation revenue steming from the strict enforcement of public drinking, pissing, vandalism, DUI, etc. downtown.
Where did that money go? It probably got siphoned off into some pension fund long ago, but that’s where the funding for downtown law enforcement should be coming from.
JD, you raise an interesting point. The cops and City Manager bemoan the fact that DTF is a budgetary sinkhole. Their idea for revenue neutrality? Not pension reform, that’s for sure! Instead they start promoting a tax that nobody except a few stooges will shill for.
How many tickets does a cop have to write on a Saturday night to cover is paycheck? Four or five? It can’t be that hard…in DTF the targets are drunk and swarming all around you!
Yes, but don’t forget you’re dealing with FPD – the stumblebums who couldn’t make a theft case when FFFF gave them pictures of the perp, a license plate and even tailed the perp back his criminal HQ.
The Gang That Can’t Shoot Straight.
So what are all bitching about tonight? Who is the guy in the picture?
If you use some white out and a Sharpie I’ll bet you could write your name on that other guy’s GED.
Anonymous sounds alot that idiot Bleed the freek.
the pigs really dont bust as many people as you would think. the drunks have gotten pretty good at avoiding cops, doing things like having buddies keep an eye out while pissing or smoking weed, drinking alcohol out of energy drink cans and such.