I am curious why two of the three of you here allowed Bruce and Greg to have total passes on why Doug’s wife wasn’t arrested for what she was caught on camera doing. They said nothing. They did nothing once again and all this after Bushala spent almost a half million dollars to install them, a couple grand on carpetbagger signs, and even a few bucks on a blazer so he could get interviewed. I am curious as to what the purpose of all this is. I am beginning to think you globetards are getting dizzy from all this perceived spinning ball nonsense. Seriously. Paulette should have been arrested and Greg and Bruce should have called for her arrest and for Chaffee to resign as mayor. Heaven forbid over the last 5 years they would have ever asked that of fitzpringle.com,
So what gives with the half million dollar bushala plants greg and bruce on the council that have REMAINED SILENT ON EVERYTHING FOR OVER 5 YEARS? How do you justify the sycophantic behavior of the three of you towards them?
not all “carpetbaggers” are bad people. As long as the people in a community are aware of the “outsider” the people of that community may choose to bring in or allow and outsider or noble intentions and notability to represent them. I would guess a large portion of the population does not understand what the term “carpetbagger” means, so a sign with another candidates name with NO in front of it and “CARPETBAGGER” could ruin their campain . So its understandable that on in this predicament would wish to remove these signs, From most of these comments and postings it seems that “carpetbaggers” are given an unfair rap. Without the recent changes in voting with districts, this same senario would play out very ethically the same person could be elected regardless of where in the city they lived. So why such a bad rap… there seems to be an assuption that district and the intentions that made it happen are fully ethical. Not so quick… the way are society is going right now…. the real oportuists are not necisarrily the “carpetbaggers” but the forces who itimidated us into accepting “segregated voting” to be the new standard. couldnt At-Large Elections Lead to Racially-Polarized Voting?If these lawsuits where done with suspicious intentions… then the “carpetbaggers” could now be seen as candidates with noble intentions to better the good of the majority… which is what Paulette Chaffee is claiming…. who is the real opportunist in Fullerton… Paulette Chaffee or Vivian Jaramillo, who alleges that Fullerton’s at-large voting “impairs the ability of certain races to elect candidates of their choice , which is an argument solely based on race and has nothing to do with experience or talent.
The policing standards are lower in Fullerton, particularly when the suspect is the mayor’s wife.
Hey, the design on those “No Carpetbagger” signs is… familiar.
So did the offender resign or end their campaign? Paulette Chaffee is still campaigning. Chaffee signs have doubled in the 5th
Now Paulette HAS to win so that she can pardon herself.
I am curious why two of the three of you here allowed Bruce and Greg to have total passes on why Doug’s wife wasn’t arrested for what she was caught on camera doing. They said nothing. They did nothing once again and all this after Bushala spent almost a half million dollars to install them, a couple grand on carpetbagger signs, and even a few bucks on a blazer so he could get interviewed. I am curious as to what the purpose of all this is. I am beginning to think you globetards are getting dizzy from all this perceived spinning ball nonsense. Seriously. Paulette should have been arrested and Greg and Bruce should have called for her arrest and for Chaffee to resign as mayor. Heaven forbid over the last 5 years they would have ever asked that of fitzpringle.com,
You are one strange cookie.
So what gives with the half million dollar bushala plants greg and bruce on the council that have REMAINED SILENT ON EVERYTHING FOR OVER 5 YEARS? How do you justify the sycophantic behavior of the three of you towards them?
Why don’t you ask them?
What exactly do you think this is, the help desk?
Everything is always about me! I demand you pay attention!
not all “carpetbaggers” are bad people. As long as the people in a community are aware of the “outsider” the people of that community may choose to bring in or allow and outsider or noble intentions and notability to represent them. I would guess a large portion of the population does not understand what the term “carpetbagger” means, so a sign with another candidates name with NO in front of it and “CARPETBAGGER” could ruin their campain . So its understandable that on in this predicament would wish to remove these signs, From most of these comments and postings it seems that “carpetbaggers” are given an unfair rap. Without the recent changes in voting with districts, this same senario would play out very ethically the same person could be elected regardless of where in the city they lived. So why such a bad rap… there seems to be an assuption that district and the intentions that made it happen are fully ethical. Not so quick… the way are society is going right now…. the real oportuists are not necisarrily the “carpetbaggers” but the forces who itimidated us into accepting “segregated voting” to be the new standard. couldnt At-Large Elections Lead to Racially-Polarized Voting?If these lawsuits where done with suspicious intentions… then the “carpetbaggers” could now be seen as candidates with noble intentions to better the good of the majority… which is what Paulette Chaffee is claiming…. who is the real opportunist in Fullerton… Paulette Chaffee or Vivian Jaramillo, who alleges that Fullerton’s at-large voting “impairs the ability of certain races to elect candidates of their choice , which is an argument solely based on race and has nothing to do with experience or talent.