Observer Pushes False Story
By now FFFF readers know that the truth and the Fullerton Observer, run by Kennedy Sisters Skaskia and Sharon, are often at odds. These two dimwits seem to think their editorializing and narrative peddling go hand in hand with reporting news.
Well, they’ve done it again.
While alerting their readers of the upcoming “Walk on Wilshire” vote on Tuesday, they lead off with this gem:
The city council is set to determine the fate of Walk On Wilshire on Tuesday, January 21, with a session at 5:30pm at Fullerton City Hall, 303 W. Commonwealth Ave. The recommendation is to accept a proposed motion to permanently close W. Wilshire from Harbor to Malden to vehicular traffic, thereby expanding Walk on Wilshire or to open the entire street to traffic by February 2025.
This is not only completely backwards, but it omits the most important part of the agenda staff report, to wit: closing the whole block is not recommended; rather opening the street back up in February 2025 is the proposed action. There is a back up option to close the street, among several others should the Council decide not to follow the recommended action.
This statement is tantamount to a lie, and at best can be considered intentional disinformation, the scrofulitic handmaiden that closely follows the Kennedy Sisters where ever they go. It’s clear they want to drum up support for the stupid boondoggle they have come to cherish, and are willing to mislead their fellow travelers into thinking that staff has actually recommended the street closure for the whole block. No, now that I think about it, this isn’t “tantamount” to a lie. It is a lie.
But the standard of objective honesty among Fullerton Observer readers seems to be so consistently low and the casual acceptance of subjective ideology so high, that this sort of bullshit passes as journalism among them.
Disinformation! Disinformation!
Scrofulitic?
Yes, complete BS (again) from Fullerton Observer. Here’s a link to the Agenda Item and the recommendation to reopen: https://fullerton.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=7096168&GUID=508C7195-6DB8-4C74-8218-1748B0688327
Sharon Kennedy has no shame. Her useless daughter knows no shame. Sisters sounds about right. Liars.
This is pretty bad, even for the Kennedy sisters. What’s that harm in telling the truth? You can whip your dummy up into a frenzy of indignation.
They sisters are so use to lying it’s virtually impossible for them to tell the truth. Why? Because the truth is real, sometimes it hurts, and they’re both incapable of looking at themselves in the mirror. If you don’t believe me, please ask any decent, honest, truth seeking person who’s ever written for the Observer.
It’s time the Fullerton City Council pull the plug on this crap-trap of a “newspaper” and yank their racks from all City (tax payer) owned property. Including but not limited to; City Hall, the Library, Community Center, and any other publicly owned properties in the City of Fullerton.
I think we all agree.
We do not.
I think if you want to print up this blog and give it out for free, you should be entitled to a spot right next to The Observer at City Hall. Then people can read The Observer, and they can also have some kindling or extreme emergency toilet paper.
The Observer is useful if you have a birdcage, doof. FFFF is going to be in City Hall. Or nobody is, see?
You can also use the Observer to clean up after working your wood.
There are rules for comebacks and insults. Violations are considered Weak Sauce.
Examples of violations:
a) Nuh uh!
b) Shut up
c) Well, you’re stupid
d) I know you are but what am I? (infinity)
e) Just repeating my joke about you and saying it about me
Oh you idiot Johnny Boy. You are a useless human being. Too much credit. You’re useless fucking liberal loser.
“intentional disinformation, the scrofulitic handmaiden that closely follows the Kennedy Sisters where ever they go.”
Thumbs up. The burn of 2025.
The Observer has now added draft language for a Resolution that directly contradicts the staff recommendation. Since it contradicts the staff conclusions about traffic, there is no way the Council could make the necessary findings. So why is it there?
Where/what “added draft language” are you referring to?
They posted draft resolution language to close the block, if the Council went against the staff recommendation.
It’s the Kennedys’ way of making THAT decision look like the recommended action. Disgusting.
Fight Truth Decay! The Observer is plaque. They are not purveyors of the truth. The Observer is now the opinions of the Kennedys and neither or either are particularly smart or truthful. Fullerton is wising up. Less people read it now and whatever influence they think they peddle is negligible.
Thankfully, the #MeToo Movement was decades later and not during the time when I was s professor at the local university and harassing females students. I ride a bike now around town so all is forgiven. Don’t tell. Don’t ask. I was a bad boy.