Saska Steps On Own Weenie
Oops. The crack Observer editor Skasia, younger member of the Kennedy Coven, has done it again.
This proud pillar of the 4th Estate decided a recap of the now dismantled Walk on Wilshire public hearing comments was in order, given that the vast majority of them yammered in favor of keeping it.
Therefore it was necessary to regurgitate the usual cut and paste mishmash of what people actually said.
Anti-WoW speaker #7 was one of them. Here’s what The Observer recollects:
7) Layla, identifying herself as the landlord of the Wilshire Promenade called into the council saying ‘The street closure has negatively impacted our tenants, and 88 Cigar Bar, Slice, and ShabuShabu. We as landlords can’t make money – we need to drive through traffic. If it remains as is or is expanded we won’t make it.” (Fullerton Promenade Apartments is one of 252 apartment complexes owned by the largest operator of apartment complexes on the West Coast – the $18.5 billion Essex Property Trust, Inc.)
Notice how at the end the end Skakia appends the obligatory and Observer biased contextual facts, claiming “Layla” represents a conglomerate of massive wealth – implying that this vast enterprise could afford to chum a few bucks for the common good, because it is so…so something.
The only problem is that “Layla” has absolutely nothing to do with the Promenade Apartment Block, but rather, works for an entity, “Fullerton Promenade,” that owns some buildings on the south side of Wilshire Avenue – precisely whose small business tenants were the most affected by the idiot closure. Layla even named her tenants!
This is exactly the sort of spiteful, inaccurate boobery that characterizes the Fullerton Observer and its crew of incompetent ideologues. I hope Layla isn’t waiting for a correction and apology, because she won’t get either.
When is the Council going to let FFFF into the lobby of City Hall? Any word?
The City is never going to let FFFF in the lobby.
Facts don’t matter to them.
No comments at the Observer any longer?
Too embarrassing.
I stopped trying. I did get a couple through under the name Mike Hunt.
Go figure.
“5) Vena, who wrote a letter to the council available in the session backup materials, pointed out “We can have more than one nice place in town.” The mic was cut off during her comment.”
Supporter of the fake candidate and perjurer Scott Markowitz whose mic was cut off because she wouldn’t shut up past her 3 minute+ ramble.
Diane Vena cried because an illegal street closure was opened. This is the kind of boohooism that has been empowered in our city by Ahmad’s virtue signaling for the last 7 years and now we are saddled with Shana doing the same thing on steroids or Ozempic.
https://www.spj.org/spj-code-of-ethics/
How many fuck ups did Saskia make in just this one story? I count seven alone falling under Seek Truth and Report it.
It’s about time someone held that rag accountable for their absolute bullshittery.
Wonder how hard it would be to get 2000 signatures asking the council to revoke the name Fullerton from this abomination?
Since it seems that 2000 is the number that represents all residents of Fullerton.
Correction. The Save Walk On Wilshire activists got only 1500 signatures and I bet most of the unknowing people who signed didn’t even live in Fullerton.
I’d like to see what nonsense verbiage was in it.
If it’s worded right you can get anybody to sign anything.
Man that Saskwatch is dumb.
LOL