Park Poor South Fullerton. Fact or Fiction?
We’ve heard a lot lately from the advocates for the failed $2,000,000 Trail to Nowhere concept that it is desperately needed in south Fullerton because south Fullerton is in desperate need of parks. Let’s set aside for just a moment the uselessness of the TtN, so we can think about the bald assertion used as a pretext to build it.
First let’s consider the talismanic mantra. Is it based on realty or is it based on the bland assumption that areas whose inhabitants are mostly those considered minorities? In governmental (and liberal) circles another term for minorities is “underserved communities,” because, it is reasoned, minorities have always got the short end of the stick, and because they need more, they must be underserved. Whether or not anybody feels like they are truly underserved is neither here nor there.
Once the notion of an underserved class of people exists, it is very simple to project the obvious conclusion that parks, being public facilities, are not being provided fairly to the underserved, and therefore those communities are “park poor.”
This train of logic is so superficial that it hardly needs to be analyzed any farther. The key here is to realize that the self-interest of government employees and the heart-felt shibboleths of liberals ignore facts. The former simply want to build new facilities they can “program” while the latter get to patronize the lower orders who need their help to enjoy the pleasures of life.
Here’s the reality in Fullerton. If we draw a line along Chapman/Malvern Avenue dividing Fullerton into north and south – as our council districts do – we see that south Fullerton has the same number of city parks as north Fullerton – 16.
“Wait, Joe,” I can hear some one saying. How can this be? South Fullerton is park poor. I read it in The Fullerton Observer. Well, here they are:
Gilbert Park
Community/Recreation Center Grounds/Gardens
Pacific Drive Park
Olive Park
Orangethorpe School Park
Nicholas Park
Independence Park
Richman Park
Woodcrest Park
Lemon Park
Adlena Park
Chapman Park
Amerige Park
Ford Park
And of course we must count UP Park and the UP Trail Phase I that the green spacers are so proud of.
There is also a park on Lawrence and Truslow.
The fact is that south Fullerton has lots of parks. And although it’s true that north Fullerton has trails along abandoned railroad right of ways those facilities are available for anybody to use, and in fact most north Fullertonions don’t have immediate access to these, either. And while the City sports parks are north of Chapman/Malvern the folks in south Fullerton seem to have no problem finding them for youth and adult leagues, just as north Fullertonions find the City’s only pool at Independence park – in south Fullerton.
Similarly, the County’s regional parks – Clark and Craig that are in the north – are open to everybody and almost all of Fullerton’s residents need to get in a car to use them.
So next time somebody proclaims authoritatively that south Fullerton in park poor and needs more open space, likely as a matter of social justice ask them if they know how many parks there are in south Fullerton and if they can name them.
Interesting and enlightening. Of course we’ll never hear this from any of the usual sources.
Most people who read the Observer can’t count anyway. That might get in the way of the cliché.
People still read the Fullerton Observer? I thought it was just a stroke mag for the Zahra swingers. Limo liberalism isn’t just in LA. Fullerton has its share of elite in ex teachers and professors.
Who did you have in mind.
It’s really too bad the Observer crowd can’t deal with facts. They reject logic every time.
Yah but what’s the comparative acreage of park land north v south?
It’s similar if you consider neighborhood parks. The point is that the facilities are there if people want to use them.
Andd nobody would use the Trail to Nowhere except the gentrified SOCO Walk – to walk their dogs, maybe.
You can’t count any of the school parks anymore… They lock their fields up despite the signs saying they’ll be unlocked after 4PM and have an armed security response. Yet the FSD people have the nerve to talk about the city’s community access to parks.
Talk to Aaruni Thakur. He’ll get it fixed.
If I remember correctly, I’ve seen “No Trespassing, Private Property” signs on our public school grounds. If they are ‘private’, does that mean we don’t need to use taxpayer money to maintain them?
Talk to Aaruni Thakur. He’ll get it fixed.
Aaruni Thakur and Rob Coghlan have been aware for a long while now.
The signs read:
WELCOME TO GOLDEN HILL THIS IS A CLOSED CAMPUS
VISITORS SHOULD REPORT TO THE MAIN OFFICE
CAMPUS HOURS 7:00 AM – 4:00 PM
GATES OPEN DURING DROP OFF AND DISMISSAL AND AFTER 4:00PM
Organized activities after 4:00 pm, weekends, holidays, and non-student days must be approved by obtaining a Facility Use Permit from the District.
Permits may be requested by going online DEN at https://www.faciltron.com/fsd92833
Leonel Talavera supports a for profit travel baseball corporation. Does their dirty work at the schools. Smells fishy.
The same number of parks but is it the same amount of acreage?
All people should have their own 40 acres to live on. It’s a human right.
FFFF’s new title — Featuring Fullerton’s Failures Forever