The No Account of Montecristo

Friends can file this story under a number of different categories: political puppetry, gross hypocrisy, unmitigated gall, comical self-righteousness, offense is the best defense; pick any one you like.

Pay no attention to the overdue bills…

At last Tuesday’s Fullerton City Council meeting we were treated to another diatribe by a guy named Oliver Montecristo attacking Fred Jung, Nick Dunlap and Jamie Valencia. We have already met Oliver, here. Oliver wants everyone to believe that Jung and his colleagues are anti-small business, a new line of attack by Ahmad Zahra and Shana Charles, two muppets who have never run a business in their lives.

I sometimes fight for transparency!

It’s pretty clear that Oliver is one of the minions in Zahra’s stable of impressionable young fellas. His other protégé, lively young Elijah Manassero, has taken up the myth of the City’s persecution of Olly’s mom, and the family restaurant, Les Amis. The rents on City property are so darn high! The Kennedy Sisters at the Fullerton Observer have also taken up the Les Amis cause.

The only problem is that the Montecristo clan led by mom, Jinan, have a notorious record of not paying their bills, and encroaching on public property without authorization or permits. Check it out:

Feb 2011         Jinan Montecristo d.b.a. Les Amis Restaurant & Lounge (Jinan) applied for an outdoor dining encroachment agreement.

Aug 2011         After several reviews of the site plan, staff provided a draft encroachment agreement to Jinan for consideration

Sept 2011        Jinan issued a letter to staff challenging the lease rates.  Les Amis installed fencing and started operating within the public right-of-way without executed agreement (south patio).

Dec 2011         Staff send revised encroachment agreement for consideration

June 2012       Jinan was issued an Administrative Restaurant Use Permit (ARUP), which included an ancillary outdoor patio.  Among other things, the conditions of the ARUP required a valid encroachment agreement pursuant to the Outdoor Dining Guidelines established by the City Council. 

July 2012         Staff send revised encroachment agreement for consideration

Dec 2015         Jinan submitted building permit to expand into the north portion of the building.

Feb 2016         Staff inform Jinan that she owed $28,659.60 for use of the public right-of-way of private benefit (9/2011 – 2/2016). 

May 2016        Modification of an Amended ARUP was approved, expanding existing restaurant into adjacent tenant space.  Jinan executed an encroachment agreement for outdoor dining (south patio only; $510/month; $6,120 annually).  The agreement also required payment for 12-month prior occupancy ($6,120; negotiated down from $28,659.60).

Aug 2016         Jinan issues a letter to staff indicated they are “unable to fulfill financial obligations” due to “hardship”.

April 2017        Jinan was issued a letter from the City attorney to pay outstanding balance on account.

May 2017        Encroachment Agreement expired.

Aug 2017         Les Amis expanded into the north patio area without a permit/agreement for outdoor dining.

Nov 2018         Jinan was issued a letter from the City attorney, indicating they are in violation of their ARUP, failed to pay the lease outlined in the executed agreement, and are required to remove encroachments (north and south patio) by Dec. 14, 2018. Jinan subsequently expressed interest in continued use of both patios.  Outstanding balance was $24,643.70 at the time.

Dec 2018         Jinan signed resolution of breach of outdoor dining encroachment agreement and FMC. Resolution waived outstanding balance on Patio 2 (north patio; $5,263.70), resulting in $19,380 of remaining account balance.

Jan 2019         Staff sent two encroachment agreement(s) for consideration.  Jinan expressed interest in removing Patio 1 (south patio) and expanding Patio 2 (north patio)

March 2019     Jinan executed Encroachment Agreement for new north patio only.  New Agreement was for $913.75/month ($510 for north patio; $403.75 for prior occupancy fee ($19,300 amortized over 48 months))

Permit was issued for removal of fencing around south patio and installation for north patio expansion per executed agreement. 

May 2020        City Council paused collecting lease revenue from all outdoor dining encroachments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Outstanding balance for all outdoor dining agreements was also waived.  Les Amis waived balance was approximately $13,647.50.

June 2022       Council approved new lease rates for outdoor dining on public property. 

Aug 2022         Les Amis reinstalled south patio without permits and/or an agreement.

Sept 2022        Jinan submitted application to reinstall south patio.

Aug 2023         Staff reinitiated collecting lease from all existing agreements.

Oct 2024         Jinan defaulted on payments from August 2023 to October 2024, accumulating a dept of $13,468.71. Jinan signed an agreement for a 12-month payment plan to pay the outstanding debt of $13,468.71. 

NOTE: this did not include prior occupancy for the reinstalled south patio.

Nov 2024         Jinan executed two superseding encroachment agreements for outdoor dining with the new lease areas and rates. 

April 2025        Jinan defaulted on payments, accumulating an outstanding balance of $26,650.96.  Staff terminated the agreements, cancelled the payment plan, issued several notices of violations, and required removal of all encroachments. Jinan expressed financial hardship and requested the City revisit the lease rate.  Jinan also paid $1,200 toward the payment plan and expressed interest in purchasing the property.  The city paused removal to explore options. 

July 2025         Jinan was once again requested to remove all unpermitted encroachments.  Jinan paid $3,900 toward the payment plan.  City Manager agree to extend the time for compliance or a change in the Outdoor Dining policy for 60 days.  To date, Jinan has an outstanding balance of $31,185.10 ($5,494.06 payment plan; $25,691.04 encroachment agreements)

Yikes! What a history of screwing the taxpayers. Almost 15 years worth. Poor, small-businessman Oliver was in fourth grade when it started.

Not paying your debts to the public is the best way to become a Sharon Quirk Woman of the Year!

Over the years Jinan has deliberately dodged paying many tens of thousands of dollars in rent to the people of Fullerton. She has illegally encroached onto public property without agreements or permits in place on numerous occasions. The record is abundantly clear: the City has bent over backward for years and years to accommodate this woman; rather than evicting Janin from the City’s property and taking her to court for the rent due she has effectively stolen, they kept giving her more opportunities to rip us off. Pathetic, really.

Found another victim!

Well, Oliver may think the documentation of his family stiffing the public is all nonsense and that somehow he and mommy are victims, doncha know; however, no one except the inordinately stupid would believe it.

The cynical manipulators like Doc Zahra don’t believe it either, but Zahra won’t miss a chance to get some eager fool to stand up and harass the people who haven’t, and won’t make him Mayor.

Shana Charles Spins Around, Goes Nowhere

As close to a somersault as we could find…

Shana Charles has flipped her stance on noise regulations. I wrote about it, here the other day.

Previously, the councilwoman proposed a 10pm cutoff on amplified music with an 11pm cutoff on weekends. This is an ideal solution, as it supports residents’ needs for peace and quiet while still recognizing the importance of nightlife to the city’s “vibe.” However, Mayor Pro-Tem Charles has renounced her previous stance and instead, her recent vote indicates that she now stands behind louder music and promotes the disruption of residents.

Shana has failed to side with the reasonable ordinance that would benefit both residents and businesses. Her stance seems to favor only the business side, ignoring the needs of the residents who deserve a quiet environment, especially during late hours. The lack of respect for all of us who live here undermines trust in our local government and shows a disregard in our community’s well being.

Once again, an elected in Fullerton has flip-flopped. Big surprise.

Obviously, Shana doesn’t live near the loud music. The amplified music is constantly disrupting our sleep, even on weeknights when rest is necessary for school and work. This inconvenience is impossible to get used to and negatively impacts our focus, energy, and overall lifestyle. It never seems to quiet and is a constant headache to all of those who are affected.

Shana’s decision was hypocritical and disrespectful to all residents. It just looked political. It’s frustrating to see those in charge act for political reasons rather than in the best interests of the community. Some councilpersons’ choices continue to show a lack of accountability and awareness of how their actions impact everyone else. Decisions like these create disappointment and distrust, making it harder for residents to believe that those leading Fullerton truly care about the people they represent.

We need to hold Mayor Pro-Tem Charles accountable for her actions and recognize what the city really needs, not what Charles wants.

Sound and Fury. Noise Ordinance Finally Approved. Downtown Is Dying.

It could be worse. It could be Speed Metal! Wait. It is!

Last night the Fullerton City Council, at long last, approved a noise-related addition to the Municipal Code. The vote was 3-2: Jung, Dunlap, and Valencia for, Charles and Zahra voting no.

This effort has been going on for over ten years, has been diddled with by more than ten City Councilpersons (Flory twice), and five City Managers, acting and permanent.

The ordinance is pretty tame really, with decibel levels I think are way too high, but at least gauged at the property line where the goofy and distracting issue of “ambient noise” can be better put to rest. Hours of outdoor music have been addressed with common sense and respect for neighboring inhabitants.

Fines for violators are in place, and about time, too.

For the business…

It was amusing to watch Zahra and Charles pretend to be “pro-business.” We know the performance was disingenuous because of their cavalier attitude to non-bar businesses on Wilshire Avenue that suffered when that pair closed the street for their absurd “Walk on Wilshire.” They ignored the fact that downtown Fullerton runs in the red and is subsidized by the rest of us. Really their act was about voting against what they characterized as the wishes of “one businessman” regardless of the need for reform.

In what surely must be the dumbest thing said in recent years at a council meeting, Ahmad Zahra claimed as a fact that the “downtown is dying,” a really weird and irresponsible thing to utter. The Dismal Damascus Doctor offered exactly zero facts to support his stupid utterance.

Transparency, uber alles!

Naturally, our friend sweet young Elijah Manassero popped up to inform the council that most of the bar owners were already non-compliant with the new rules. His logic led him to conclude that therefore the new regulations were ill-advised. It didn’t seem to occur to the tender sprout that the continual bar-owner abuse of existing law was precisely why the new ordinance was needed. I have no idea what they’re teaching the young folk these days, but thinking doesn’t seem to be in the bundle, although I’m sure callow Elijah has loads and loads of self esteem.

Now it will be time to see if the City Code Enforcement operation will employ the willingness and the competence to enforce the law. They have stubbornly refused to do so in the past, partly because councilmembers were running interference for the scofflaws. And part of the reason for staff’s reluctance might be because enforcement implies some sort of fault or failure, and in City Hall the decades long mess they made out of downtown Fullerton, has been characterized as a stunning and inarguable success.

A Commonsense Solution for Downtown Music

Downtown Fullerton, tucked in the heart of North Orange County, is a lively crossroads where the buzz of nightlife meets the calm of residential living. Unfortunately, not all of us are college kids eager to party till sunrise and sleep through the aftermath. Some of us — like my family and me — actually need a decent night’s rest to function. Our neighborhood is a quirky blend of bars, restaurants, and single-family homes — charming on paper, but in practice, the nonstop thump of amplified music quickly drowns out the appeal. 

The amplified music is constantly disrupting our sleep, even on weeknights when rest is necessary for school and work. This inconvenience is impossible to get used to and negatively impacts our focus, energy, and frankly our wallets thanks to the obscene amount of caffeine it takes to stay functional.

In 2023, then Councilwoman Shanna Charles stepped forward with a practical solution: a curfew on outdoor amplified music. During the week, a 10 PM cutoff would provide much-needed respite, while an 11 PM cutoff on weekends would strike a balance between nightlife and residential needs. After the curfew, bars can continue to play music inside at any volume, preserving the lively atmosphere for patrons without disturbing nearby residents.

As residents, my family and I wholeheartedly support councilwoman Charles’ proposal as we believe that this act would create harmony in the diversity of Fullerton. The proposal recognizes that while nightlife and entertainment are vital to the city’s character and economy, so too are the families, students, and professionals who call this place home. By supporting this initiative, we’re not trying to quiet the city’s energy — we’re simply asking for a balance that lets Fullerton thrive without keeping its residents awake all night.

Let’s come together in support of Councilwoman Charles’s initiative to foster a community where residents and businesses can flourish side by side. Downtown Fullerton deserves a future where its lively spirit and the everyday comfort of its people exist in balance.

The Return of the Stolen Sidewalk?

I noticed this closed session item on this Tuesday’s Fullerton City Council meeting agenda.

Almost forgotten but not gone…

Commonwealth and Harbor LLC, AKA Mario Marovic has been in litigation with the City for a long time now claiming some sort of misfeasance on the City’s part in the ongoing saga of the Florentine stolen sidewalk.

Sit down and grab some sidewalk, brother…

Friends may remember that Marovic turned out to be just as big a scammer as the Florentine Mob. After they walked away from their lease, he took over and planned to open two new bars.

It’s there, just take it.

He actually remodeled the so-called pop out without permission as part of his redesign. Oops. The pop-out belonged (and still belongs) to the City.

In the fall of 2023 the City decided it wanted the sidewalk back; Marovic wanted to open his fake Irish pub. Yes it was a clusterfuck courtesy of the boneheadedness of a City bureaucrat named Paul Dudley over twenty years ago. He talked the Council into letting the Florentines put a new building on a public sidewalk, a building addition not owned by the guys who owned the main building to which it is still attached. Oops.

A deal was struck a deal under which Marovic could get opened and the City could finally get its sidewalk back. Marovic could open Mickey’s Irish Pub bars and had until March 2024 to begin demolition of the offending bump out. The remediation work had to be done by July 2024.

March 2024 came and went; March 2025 came and went. There was no work performed. Instead Marovic continued to use the public’s building and sued the City. I hope he was paying rent to us, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t.

Another stand up DTF bar owner…

Marovic has been in breech of his agreement for over a a year and a half. For some reason the City has been playing a protracted legal game with this individual instead of evicting him from our premises for being in default. Maybe the City-folk were trying to dodge personal embarrassment – just like their predecessors have done for the past two decades. Maybe they were still hoping that Marovic, somehow, would do what he was supposed to do – a hope so incredible as to be absurd.

My hope is that no settlement is made, at least not one where the City is not fully recompensed; that Marovic pays for the City to do the demolition work (he can repair his own building exterior), covers all our legal fees, and kicks back a portion of the profit he has made using our building.

Zahra Congratulates Marovic for his lawsuit…against us.

I am not hopeful about my hope. The City can’t even seem to get Les Amis to pay their years late rent. Playing hardball just isn’t in their repertoire. My guess is that the City will vote to give Good Ol’ Mario a second chance. Or maybe they’ll just drop the thing altogether and the sidewalk will remain as is.

Transparency, uber alles!

Incidentally, I wonder if Ahmad Zahra and his young sprout Elijah Manassero will give the stolen sidewalk item the scrutiny and transparency the public needs. Bet not.

We Get Mail: The Missing Planters

More pathos…

FFFF received an email yesterday from one of our readers. I reproduce the text below:

FFFF, I was at the UP Park “community event” on the 13th. I read your post about the event and I have to say it brought some things into focus. Why were we doing the last thing first? It seemed cooked up.

Anyway, what I want to find out about is the status of the wooden raised garden bins built that day. They were supposed to be used for a community garden and now they have completely disappeared from the park.

Why?

Did the City take them away? Were they stolen? Where are they?

Hey, the Friend is right. Here’s the area where the alleged “community garden” is supposed to be. I took the picture yesterday afternoon.

No bins today…

And here’s the image from the Big Party.

Bins to the left of them, bins to the right of them…

The answers to the questions are unknown. I imagine the bins were removed by the City. But why? To protect them from graffiti? From theft? Geez, that would be a bad omen for the success of the park.

Were they in the way of the contractor now that the “Volunteer Futility” is over? That speaks volumes to the insincere quality of the community event.

You have to wonder about the sincerity of the City toward the idea of a community garden, especially from the Parks department people who would have to deal with the managerial headache with no extra budget, no extra manpower, and zero upside for them.

Anyway, if I can find out where the bins are, I’ll let our reader know.

He’s Baaack

Zahra’s ride may soon be over…

Who says “nobody” reads the FFFF blog? Well, they do in City Hall, obviously.

It turns out that “Dr.” Ahmad Zahra’s campaign committee maybe wasn’t terminated after all. It’s now back on the active list on the City Clerk’s website! Looks like the “new crew” did another oopsy.

And that’s terrific news for those of us who were looking forward to next year’s Fullerton City Council election in District 5.

Zahra rap sheet

See, Mr. Zahra faces all sorts of challenges of his own creation, and he has voluntarily made enemies where he ought not to have. Here’s a partial list of Zahra’s transgressions – stuff that his blind followers love to ignore, but issues that may resonate with the electorate at large.

  1. In the 1990s gay immigrant Zahra committed marriage fraud by marrying an American woman (a federal felony), so he could stay in the United States and pave the way for eventual citizenship.
  2. In 2020 Zahra was charged with assault and battery and vandalism against a woman, “M. Farias.” He claimed exoneration, which was a lie. He has shown no evidence.
  3. In 2020 and 2021 Zahra committed plagiarism by taking articles written by somebody else and having them published in the Fullerton Observer under his own name.
  4. In October of 2022 Zahra filed a false police report to the FPD claiming that his colleague, Fred Jung assaulted him (or some such thing). The report was rejected.
  5. In 2020 Zahra tried to raise taxes on his “underserved” peeps during the Covid pandemic.
  6. When he was first elected in 2019 he proclaimed the need for an election to fill the vacancy left by Jesus Quirk-Silva; a month later he voted to appoint the execrable Jan Flory in exchange for a well-paying appointment to the Orange County Water District, his only identified source of income.
  7. In 2022, Zahra and the OC Democrat party created a phony Latino candidate, Tony Castro, to draw votes away from his Latino opponent.
  8. Zahra is currently being investigated by the California Fair Political Practices Commission for numerous violations of campaign rules regarding unreported campaign payments that may have been illegal payments…to himself.
  9. In 2021 Zahra tried to convert the UP Park into a private, for profit event center, an illegal move that would have landed the City in multiple lawsuits.
  10. Zahra voted to pursue the disastrous lawsuit against David Curlee, Joshua Ferguson, and FFFF that cost the City the better part of a million bucks.
  11. Etc., etc., etc.
My chances are this big…

If he stays in the race, Zahra would go up against Oscar Valadez, the guy who would have beat him last time around, except for Castro, and who’s returning to the fray in 2026. Then there’s his biggest antagonist, Tony Bushala, who seems to want to make it his business to rid the city of this con artist. Mr. Bushala has the means and the motive to do so.

In 2022 Zahra spent well over $100,000 to squeak out a tainted victory. Right now he has less than six grand in his committee account. While we may expect the OC Dems to enlist another candidate to draw votes from Zahra opponents (the Scott Marowitz Experience may frighten them off), it’s hard to see a path forward for the disingenuous doctor from Damascus.

The Lonely Kaboom Park

“Whereof what’s past is prologue,”

About a week and a half a go the Fullerton Observer ran an update on their earlier propaganda about the rebuilding of the Union Pacific Park. You may remember the slight-of-hand article that mischaracterized the history of the park. FFFF pointed out that it wasn’t the toxic soil issue that closed the park. Rather it was the derelict state of the majority of the park that hadn’t been closed at all.

Truslow residents will surely remember that the park had become a magnet for drunks, druggies, and FTT gang members who claimed it as their own turf. The City Manager, Joe “Wild Ride” Felz decided to put up a fence around the whole disaster, and forget about it. And it’s been that way ever since.

On September 13th a horde of volunteers showed up to install a “Kaboom Park” – prefab plastic kiddie equipment surrounded by what look like wood chips to cushion the fall of the young children. Three pitiable sycamore saplings were planted.

The whole thing was an exercise in political, public mobilization since a little crew could have done the job in a few hours, but that would have missed the point: a bountiful opportunity for speeches, selfless volunteering, photo ops, demonstrations, and of course the usual liberal hosannas about “public health” and “underserved communities.”

More pathos…

Two weeks later the Kaboom park sits there alone, still fenced off from the community who is said by the Kennedy Sisters to have longingly waited for the park’s re-opening. When is the fence coming down? I bet nobody has asked. Sometime in the near future the rest of the park is supposed to be worked on. Will it be after that? Was the Kaboom operation just an empty feel-good gesture to show that something, anything was happening?

It seems to me that this little playground assembly should have been the last thing to go in, not the first. But what do I know about parks? Surely not as much as City Hall does.

Public health advocates…

Anyway, several local politicians showed up to get their picture taken, including Ahmad Zahra of course, who never misses a self-promotional opportunity. He reportedly didn’t stay to actually do any work – not even to claw at the dirt with a rake or to give moral support. He supposedly left after the pictures were taken.

The future of the re-opened park, whenever the fence comes down, doesn’t look promising. Nobody has asked about the condition and influence of the social pathologies that caused the park to be closed by Felz in the first place. Everyone has decided to conveniently forget the true history of the park

The rundown “Trail Phase 1” hasn’t been cleaned up and is usually occupied by somebody selling drugs of some sort. The Harbor bridge leading to the park from the east is a disgusting mess of graffiti, trash and broken light fixtures. Fullerton Tokers Town is still around, still marking its territory with regularity.

Tender Young Elijah Keeps Steppin’ on His Own Weenie. And Other Weenies, Too

Last month FFFF published a post about how sweet, fresh Elijah Manassero scribbled an article for the Fullerton Observer attacking Mayor Fred Jung for misusing Fullerton’s city seal. A little later we noted with some amusement that the young sapling Manassero posted his string of attacks on the council majority and the Bushala family on a subReddit that swiped…Fullerton’s city seal!

Well, it appears that somebody, somewhere took notice of the problem. Sometime in the past week the subReddit page quit using the city seal and replaced it with this image.

Hmm. Now that looks sort of familiar. Oops!

Turns out the newly adopted image of r/Fullerton is a protected trademark, registered by the City with the United State Patent and Trademark Office over 20 years ago! Ouch.

Now that’s not very good is it? More bad behavior by r/Fullerton and hypocrisy from their frequent contributor, youthful Elijah.

I don’t think that the dainty fleur Elijah cares much about the sort of legal niceties involved with intellectual property theft, and probably knows even less about this sort of thing than he does about commercial leases (BTW, has fresh young Elijah sought legal recourse about the Bushala depot lease like he said he would, or was that just the loud screeching of a baby paper tiger?).

Remember. It’s not a lie…if you believe it.

The irony of a self-righteous purveyor of prevarication getting tangled up in this sort of embarrassment is palpable. However, Fullerton Boohoo characters are not known for the kind of self-introspection needed to understand irony. After all, they celebrate the deadbeat Ahmad Zahra’s brainy outpourings, despite his getting busted for plagiarism – another kind of intellectual theft.